Business All-Star Logo

Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement Recall Claims

The Zimmer NexGen knee replacement system is noted for its high rate of failure, having caused painful and debilitating effects for many individuals who have had the device fitted. Zimmer Biomet has recalled many of its implants and offered to cover the cost of a new knee joint. However, if a device made by this company has caused you long-lasting pain, suffering or disability, you may be eligible to bring a claim for compensation.

Zimmer NextGen knee replacement

Helpful Information

Founded in 1927, Zimmer Biomet designs components for replacement joints including the knee and hip. The company is the largest knee implant manufacturer in the world, having sold over 3 million NextGen knee implants since 1995. Although the NexGen implants were popular and effective, in 2001 they began distributing a new model of High Flex NexGen implants. There have been many hundreds of complaints and lawsuits in relation to this model which has loosened during use causing increased pain, premature knee implant failure, and expensive revision surgery.

Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement Recalls

There has been multiple Zimmer NexGen knee replacement recalls over the years. In January 2016, 42,064 units were recalled due to packaging-related issues. In May 2016, over 10k units of the Persona Trabecular Metal Tibial Plate Knee implants were recalled due to implant loosening. 15k units were recalled in January 2017 following mislabeling and packaging problems. The following month, 28k Zimmer Biomet polyethene joint components were recalled due to elevated endotoxin levels. An unspecified number of Zimmer Biomet implants were recalled in 2020 when samples were found to exceed the FDA-adopted standard for endotoxin levels. Recent lawsuits relating to a Zimmer NexGen knee replacement recall include a plaintiff in Georgia who claims the medical device “sheared” inside his knee.

Studies by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and British Medical Journal (BMJ) have identified multiple issues with metal-on-metal devices. One of the most notable issues, identified by the BMJ, is a much higher rate of revision therapy compared to metal-on-polyethene implants. This contradicts many manufacturers’ claims of increased durability by using metal-on-metal components. Studies have also shown that metal-on-metal products increase the chances of joint dislocation and increase the concentrations of metallic ions within the bloodstream.

Bringing a Faulty Zimmer Biomet Knee Replacement Claim

Individuals who have brought lawsuits against Zimmer Biomet have successfully sought compensation for surgical expenses, permanent disability directly caused by the implants, lost income due to inability to work, the cost of rehabilitation, the cost of home care, and general compensation for pain and suffering.

If you have been fitted with a Zimmer NexGen device, and you have suffered as a result of this implant, it is possible that you have grounds for bringing a claim against this manufacturer. To start this process, please get in touch with our specialist medical negligence solicitors today to discuss your case.

Start Your Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement Recall Claim

If you are currently experiencing issues with a Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement System, or you have already had a defective knee system replaced, get in touch with our specialist solicitors today to gather more information about your options for bringing a case. Call us on 1800 390 555 and an experienced member of staff will discuss your situation and potential next steps. You can also email on and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

Speak to our legal team now about your case. Call us Freephone on:

1800 390 555

Request A Call Back

Get a call back from our legal team at a time that suits you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Highly rated on TrustPilot

Read the latest reviews written by our happy clients.

Our Awards & Accreditations

We are a multi-award winning firm, accredited by the Law Society of Ireland.

LQS Logo
Business All-Star Logo
Irish law awards logo
Winner of Irish Law Awards logo
Apil Logo
Law Society of Ireland logo
Irish Law Awards winner logo
Irish Law Awards 2014 winner logo
Litigation Law Firm of the Year Logo

In contentious business, a legal practitioner shall not charge any amount in respect of legal costs expressed as a percentage or proportion of any damages (or other moneys) that may become payable to his or her client or purport to set out the legal costs to be charged to a junior counsel as a specified percentage or proportion of the legal costs paid to a senior counsel. A legal practitioner shall not without the prior written agreement of his or her client deduct or appropriate any amount in respect of legal costs from the amount of any damages or moneys that become payable to the client in respect of legal services that the legal practitioner provided to the client.

Our Partners

Directly contact our partners via email about your case.

Flor McCarthy

Flor McCarthy

Follow Flor on Social Media

Twitter: @flormccarthy LinkedIn: /in/flormccarthy/

wears multiple hats, not only as the managing partner of one of Ireland’s leading law firms, but also as an author, speaker and an acknowledged expert in client service, innovation and marketing.

Beginning his academic journey at UCC, Flor furthered his education with a master’s degree in law from UCD. After gaining valuable experience as a solicitor in Dublin, the allure of home and the family brought him back to West Cork to contribute his expertise to the family business.
[Read More]

John McCarthy

John McCarthy

Follow John on Social Media

LinkedIn: /in/johnmccarthysolicitor/

is a seasoned solicitor with almost 20 years of experience, specialises in personal injury and medical negligence claims, focusing particularly on high-value compensation cases. His extensive litigation experience spans Circuit Court, High Court and Supreme Court levels.

John's practice involves a diverse range of cases, from personal injury and wrongful death to property damage, defective products, professional negligence and judicial reviews.
[Read More]