Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Claims

A spinal cord stimulator is implanted to ease severe chronic pain, so it is particularly distressing when a defective device does the opposite, causing worsening pain, nerve damage, or repeated surgery. Where your injury was caused by a faulty stimulator, you may be entitled to compensation. This kind of claim is usually made against the manufacturer of the device rather than the doctor who fitted it.

Female patient receiving spinal cord care

Bringing a Spinal Cord Stimulator Compensation Claim

Here at McCarthy + Co Solicitors LLP, our team has acted for many clients in defective medical device claims, and this work is led by our head litigation lawyer, John McCarthy. John has extensive experience in product liability and medical negligence litigation, at Circuit Court, High Court, and Supreme Court level, including claims on behalf of patients harmed by implanted devices. To arrange a time to speak with John, complete our quick and confidential online form.

Common issues with spinal cord stimulators

A spinal cord stimulator is a small implanted device, consisting of a pulse generator and electrode leads placed near the spinal cord, that delivers electrical impulses to mask chronic pain signals before they reach the brain. When it works well, it can transform a patient’s quality of life. When it fails, however, the consequences can be serious. Common problems include:

  • migration or fracture of the electrode leads, so that stimulation is lost or misdirected;
  • device or battery malfunction, causing a loss of pain relief;
  • excessive or misdirected stimulation, causing burning sensations, electric shocks, or muscle problems;
  • infection at the implant site; and
  • nerve damage, which in severe cases can cause lasting weakness or paralysis.

Because the device sits so close to the spinal cord, a failure, or a further operation to remove or replace it, carries real risk, so an early problem should always be taken seriously.

A high-risk category of device

Spinal cord stimulators are associated with a high rate of problems, which is a key reason why a device failure is worth investigating. Published literature reviews put the overall complication rate at roughly 30 to 40 per cent, with migration of the electrode leads the most common hardware complication, and a meaningful proportion of patients eventually having the device removed, often because it is not relieving their pain. The scale of reported problems is striking: an Associated Press investigation of United States regulatory data found that spinal cord stimulators had drawn the third-highest number of injury reports of any medical device type, with more than 80,000 incidents flagged between 2008 and 2018.

These figures need to be read with care. They are drawn from United States data, an injury report records an incident rather than a proven fault, and many complications relate to the surgery, or to the nature of the therapy, rather than to a defect in the device itself. They do, however, show that these are high-risk devices where problems are far from rare. Whether your particular experience involves a defective product, as opposed to a recognised risk of the treatment, is a fact-specific question, and one we can help you answer.

“McCarthy + Co Solicitors, particular mention to John McCarthy, provided me with an exceptional service during my personal injury case, which was both long and stressful. They were always quick to respond and made me feel supported and well informed throughout the whole process. I would have no hesitation recommending this firm to family and friends. Thanks to all the team at McCarthy’s.”

John Flynn

Call us Freephone to Discuss Your Case:

1800 390 555

Request A Call Back

Get a call back from our legal team at a time that suits you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Highly rated on TrustPilot

Read the latest reviews written by our happy clients.

Meet John McCarthy

John McCarthy is a partner at McCarthy + Co Solicitors LLP, with more than 20 years of experience in medical negligence and product liability claims, including claims on behalf of patients harmed by implanted medical devices. He has represented clients in high-value cases at the High Court and Supreme Court level, with a commitment to securing the fair compensation his clients need to aid their recovery.

John holds a diploma in civil litigation from the Law Society of Ireland and is a member of Action Against Medical Accidents (AvMA), the leading patient safety charity. He is also the author of A Patient’s Guide to Bringing a Claim for Medical Negligence. If you have suffered as a result of a defective spinal cord stimulator, you can contact John directly at john@mccarthy.ie.

John McCarthy, Medical Negligence Solicitor

Frequently Asked Questions

Some of the questions often posed to our medical negligence team.

Which spinal cord stimulators have been associated with problems?

Devices from the main manufacturers, including Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Nevro, have at various times been the subject of safety notices, recalls, or litigation, for issues ranging from battery and charging faults to lead problems and overheating. If you are unsure which device you received, your hospital records and implant card will identify it, and we can help you obtain them.

What kinds of harm can support a claim?

A wide range, including worsening or unrelieved pain, burning sensations or electric shocks, lead migration or fracture, infection, nerve damage, and the need for further surgery to remove or replace the device. Where a defect has caused serious or lasting harm, a claim can cover both general damages for the injury and special damages for financial losses such as medical costs and lost earnings.

How do I prove a defective device claim?

You need to show that the device was defective and that the defect caused your injury. Under the product liability regime this is a strict liability test, so you do not have to prove negligence, but you do need evidence, typically your medical and surgical records, the device details, any manufacturer safety notices, and, where possible, the retrieved device, together with independent expert opinion. We gather and organise this for you.

How long do I have to make a claim?

For a defective product claim, generally three years from the date you became aware of the injury, the defect, and the producer, with a ten-year long-stop from when the device was put into circulation. This differs from the two-year limit for a medical negligence claim against a clinician or hospital. The long-stop rules can be complex, so take advice rather than assume you are out of time.

How can a solicitor help me bring a claim?

A defective device claim can be technical, so a solicitor takes that work on for you: tracing the correct manufacturer or importer, gathering the medical records and expert evidence needed to show the device was defective and caused your injury, checking the time limits, and dealing with the manufacturer and its insurers to secure the compensation you are owed.

Medical Negligence Team at McCarthy + Co

Law Firm of the Year

We won the highly coveted overall national “Law Firm of the Year” award at the Dye & Durham Irish Law Awards.

Useful resources

Some links that you may find useful:

Our Awards & Accreditations

We are a multi-award winning firm, accredited by the Law Society of Ireland.

Law Firm of the Year - Irish Law Awards
Irish Law Awards 2022 - Winner of Excellence & Innovation in Client Services
Irish Law Awards 2022 - Excellence & Innovation in Client Services
Irish Law Awards 2021 - Litigation Law Firm of the Year (Munster)
Q9000 The Legal Quality Standard of Ireland
Apil Accredited Practice
Law Society of Ireland - Practising Solicitor
Business All-Star Logo
AvMA logo 2026
Irish Law Awards Winner 2014