When a relationship ends, the practical questions about children arrive long before the legal ones are settled. Where will the children live? How often will they see their other parent? Who decides which school they attend, or whether they can travel abroad?
Three legal concepts govern the answers, and they are regularly confused with one another. Guardianship, custody, and access are separate, and a parent can hold one without holding the others. Our family law team spends a lot of time untangling this for clients, because misunderstanding it is a common cause of unnecessary conflict.
Guardianship
Guardianship is the most significant of the three. A guardian has legal authority over the major decisions in a child’s life, including education, religion, medical treatment, where the child lives, and whether the child may be issued with a passport.
Guardianship arises automatically for:
- all mothers, whether married or not
- married fathers, including adoptive parents
- an unmarried father who has lived with the child’s mother for twelve consecutive months, at least three of which were after the child was born
That final route was introduced by the Children and Family Relationships Act 2015 and applies to periods of cohabitation from January 2016 onwards. Being named on a birth certificate does not, on its own, make a father a guardian.
Where automatic guardianship does not apply, an unmarried father has two routes. If the mother agrees, both parents sign a joint statutory declaration in front of a Peace Commissioner or a Commissioner for Oaths, which is straightforward and inexpensive. If she does not agree, he can apply to the District Court.
Step-parents, civil partners, and long-term cohabitants may also apply for guardianship, as may someone who has provided a child’s day-to-day care for a continuous period where no other guardian is willing or able to act. Guardianship normally continues until the child turns eighteen.
Custody
Custody concerns the physical care and upbringing of a child, meaning who the child lives with and who looks after them daily.
Custody can be sole, where the child lives primarily with one parent, or joint, where both parents share the care. Joint custody does not necessarily mean an equal division of time, and we usually advise clients to focus on the arrangement that works for the child rather than on the label attached to it. A midweek overnight that fits around school and work is often worth more than a theoretical fifty-fifty split that nobody can sustain.
Separation or divorce does not remove guardianship from either parent. A parent without day-to-day custody still retains the right to be consulted on major decisions.
Access
Access is the arrangement for contact between a child and a parent, or another adult, with whom the child does not live. It may include daytime visits, overnight stays, alternate weekends, portions of school holidays, and telephone or video contact.
Access is best understood as the child’s right rather than the adult’s. Courts start from the position that a child benefits from a relationship with both parents, and access is refused or supervised only where contact would harm the child’s welfare.
A father who is not a guardian can still apply for access. So can grandparents, siblings, and other relatives (see also my article on the rights of grandparents regarding grandchildren). Where an access order is being frustrated, the court can make an enforcement order, which may include compensatory time with the child, reimbursement of wasted expenses, or a direction to attend a parenting programme or mediation information session.
How the court decides
Applications are made under the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964, as amended, and the governing principle is the best interests of the child. Since the 2015 Act, the statute sets out the factors a judge must weigh, which include:
- the benefit to the child of a meaningful relationship with both parents and with other relatives
- the child’s own views, given due weight according to age and maturity
- the child’s physical, psychological, emotional, and educational needs
- the history of the child’s upbringing and care
- the capacity of each parent to care for the child and to facilitate the child’s relationship with the other parent
- the effect of any household violence on the child’s safety and wellbeing
Most applications are heard in the District Court, which sits in private in family law matters. The Courts Service charges no fee for a family law application, although legal and mediation costs may arise. The Legal Aid Board assists those who qualify financially.
How these cases are heard is also changing. Under the Family Courts Act 2024, dedicated family court divisions with full-time specialist judges are due to begin operating in three locations from January 2027, with a phased national rollout to follow.
Agreement is usually better than a court order
In our experience, the arrangements that last are the ones the parents shaped themselves. Court is sometimes necessary, particularly where there are safety concerns or entrenched disagreement, but mediation often takes only three to six sessions and leaves both parents with an arrangement they helped design. An agreement reached that way can still be recorded in a court order so that it carries legal force.
Speak to our family law team
Guardianship, custody, and access decisions shape your relationship with your child for years, and the right approach depends on your circumstances. The family law team at McCarthy + Co Solicitors LLP can advise you on where you stand, negotiate on your behalf, and bring or defend a court application where necessary. Arrange a consultation today using our quick and confidential online form.
0 Comments